FACTS: This is a matter for admission to
the bar and oath taking of a successful bar applicant. Petitioner Al
Caparros Argosino was previously involved with hazing which caused the death of
Raul Camaligan a neophyte during fraternity initiation rites but
he was convicted for Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Homicide. He was
sentenced with 2 years and 4 months of imprisonment where he applied
a probation thereafter which was approved and granted by the court. He took the bar
exam and passed but was not allowed to take the oath. He filed
for a petition to allow him to take the lawyer’s oath of office and to admit
him to the practice of law averring that his probation was already terminated.
The court note that he spent only 10 months of the probation period before it
was terminated.
ISSUE: Whether or not Al
Argosino may take the lawyer’s oath office and admit him to the practice of
law.
HELD: The practice of law is a privilege granted only to those who
possess the STRICT, INTELLECTUAL and MORAL QUALIFICATIONS required of
lawyers who are instruments in the effective and efficient administration of
justice. The court upheld the principle of maintaining the good moral character
of all Bar members, keeping in mind that such is of greater importance so far
as the general public and the proper administration of justice are concerned.
Hence he was asked by the court to produce evidence that would certify that
he has reformed and has become a responsible member of the community through
sworn statements of individuals who have a good reputation for truth and who
have actually known Mr. Argosino for a significant period of time to certify that
he is morally fit to the admission of the law profession. The
petitioner is then allowed to take the lawyer’s oath, sign the Roll of
Attorney’s and thereafter to practice the legal profession.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento